^{_{(Image courtesy of http://m-kemal.blogspot.com/)}}
"It's My Secret Prayer, Too," He Confessed

ZICHRON YAAKOV - There were two questions I wanted to ask, I said over the phone to Batya Keinan, spokeswoman for Israeli president Ezer Weizman, who was about to leave the next day, Monday, Jan. 24, on the first visit ever made to Turkey by a Jewish chief of state. One was whether Mr. Weizman would be taking part in an official ceremony commemorating Kemal Ataturk.
Ms. Kenan checked the president's itinerary, according to which he and his wife would lay a wreath on Ataturk's grave the morning of their arrival, and asked what my second question was.
"Does President Weizman know that Ataturk had Jewish ancestors and was taught Hebrew prayers as a boy?"
"Of course, of course," she answered as unsurprisedly as if I had inquired whether the president was aware that Ataturk was Turkey's national hero.

"It is only in regards to those who fought against you on account of religion,
and that have driven you out of your homes, and helped to drive you out, that Allah forbids you to befriend them.
And whosever will befriend them, then those are the Zalimun (wrong-doers)" (60:9)

If it looks like Bush, sounds like Bush, walks, talks, and acts like Bush, it must be a Pro-American puppet-ruler over a predominantly Muslim land. It seems every politician on the planet feels the need to play an active role in the largely fraudulent “Global War on Terror.” Still, the plausibility that there will eventually be a return to a functioning, secure “Islamic State” can increasingly be discerned despite incessant efforts to quell every attempt to even facilitate the possibility. There has been Afghanistan, Sudan, Somalia, and the like and all have been beaten back tragically with violence and with the subsequent blame being placed on the “terrorist, Muslims.” But developments concur that there are still major sections of many Muslim countries that are willing to sacrifice great efforts to realize this cause.

Narrated Abdullah ibn Amr ibn al-'As:
The Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) cursed the one who bribes and the one who takes bribes.
(Sunnan Dawood - Book 24, Number 3573)

On July 6, The Guardian, a BBC derivative released what by now should have made headlines across every single newspaper and media outlet in the world. Having conducted an analysis of the Al-Yamamah arms deal, arranged as the biggest arms deal in the history of the world, it was alleged that BAE Systems, Britain’s largest defense manufacturer, had delivered approximately $2 billion over a 22 year period to Prince Bandar bin-Sultan, Saudi Arabia’s National Security Chief and longtime friend of the Bush and Cheney cabal. The allegations were however categorically denied by the Prince on June 13 as he claimed in an interview that, “The allegations in The Guardian have nothing to do with the truth and reality but represent a pinnacle of slander and lies…” “All the amounts mentioned by the newspaper were transferred from Saudi government accounts to other accounts of the Saudi government in the United States, and not to my personal accounts,” Prince Bandar said. “It is illogical to believe that any transfer in keeping with US and British banking regulations can be kept secret, or without the governments or the parties concerned being informed.” He said, “All the parties concerned in the Saudi government were aware and fully informed of all the spending through the ACCOUNTS IN RIGGS BANK…” He went on to explain that Saudi Arabia was aware of all the transactions and activities with the account and continues to deny the accusations.

“The Best Jihad is to Say the Truth in Front of the Oppressive Ruler¹”

King Abdullah’s recent comments, calling the American Dajjal Army in Iraq an “illegitimate foreign occupation²,” may come across to many Muslims as a breath of fresh air. Could it be that after seventy-plus years of supporting American, capitalist interests the House of Saud actually wants to stand up and separate itself from the imperialist beast? The shadows on the wall seem to confirm speculation but upon analysis one sees very clearly the political intention of King Abdullah’s statements. The House of Saud is one of the most dangerous institutions presently at war against Islam. Islamic voices across the globe should call for the dismemberment of the authoritarian regime, the expulsion from positions of authority for all individuals that protect them, and the subsequent reimplementation of the actual shariah thru means of reestablishing a caliphate across Islamic lands.

There is a difference between the hadharah (civilization) and the madaniyah (material aspect of culture). The hadharah constitutes the whole concepts about life whereas the madaniyah means the material forms of sensed objects(SMS,internet,motorbike and the like) used in daily life affairs. The hadharah is based on a particular point of view in life and therefore it is specific. The madaniyah can be of two kinds: specific or universal.

In regards to the statement of the kalima recited from the mouth of Saddam Hussein, it is clear from the evidences from the Qur'an and sunnah that in order for the murtadeen(i.e. Saddam Hussein) to be considered Muslim they need to publicly reject what made them an apostate in the first place. Just as in the past when jahil Muslims took Atatürk as a "hero of Islam" we are seeing the same today with Saddam due to the abandoning of the Shariah. The U.S. media seems to have taken quite an extensive coverage of this event as if it were a great victory for the freedom-loving world. Not to mention that it was the same freedom-promoting government that supported this dictator at the beginning. Below are the evidences which prove otherwise for those Muslims who have let their emotions becomes their guidelines.

In the time of the Ghuraba and fasad of the Deen, people are far way from the Wahie and the Sunnah. Every body will follow the majority and leave the Qur'an and Sunnah, few people will hold strong to the Deen.

The Messenger Muhammad (saw) said “Islam start as something strange will return back as something strange, paradise is for the strangers”. The Ghuraba (strangers) are those who reject to be from amongst the deviants.

Quba (shajarah) is a tree in paradise that’s width is like the heavens and the earth. That tree is for the believers.

The following are examples taken from the time of the prophet Muhammad s.a.w.

NOTE: In Islamic 'Aqeedah, we have a principle which states:

‘WE CONSIDER THE APPARENT ON THE MATTER OF IMAAN AND KUFR’

Evidence 1

Muslim Vol 2 p107, Nawawi Usama Ibn Zaid: was sent on an expedition by the Messenger Muhammad (saw). He said: ‘One of the Mushrikeen said laa ilaaha illalah and I killed him but I felt bad and I told the Messenger Muhammad’ The Messenger Muhammad (saw) said: ‘Did you kill him after he said laa ilaaha illalah?’ Usamah said 'Yes, but he only said it because he feared from my weapon.' Muhammad s.a.w. said ‘Did you check his heart?’ He kept repeating it until I felt that I wished I became Muslim on that day and not before.

In another narration it is reported: the Messenger Muhammad (saw) said ‘What will you do if he comes to you on the day of judgement with his Kalima’ and whenever I asked the Messenger Muhammad (saw) to ask forgiveness he repeated the same statement to me’

Hence the Messenger Muhammad (saw) eventually said to him: ‘Go and replace the la illaaha illalah with a kaafir’ [this was encouragement from the Prophet Muhammad (saw) to him] hence he always said ‘Do not delay the army of Usaama’ on his death bed because it was the expedition of his life.

Usama Ibn Zaid was dispraised strongly and made Inkaar on him powerfully because he judged by the inner and not outer.

Here is a classic example of how a government influences an Islamic organization to change the agenda to make it their own. This organization along with its promoters have already received £350,000 from the British government to promote their agenda.
(Source: 1. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm061020/text/61020w0004.htm
2. http://www.fco.gov.uk/servlet/Front/TextOnly?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1153388310360&to=true

There is no shadow of a doubt that this is done deliberately to conform to "British Norms" of societal behavior. This is done to change the Islamic agenda to conform to the British governments agenda. Once this is done, it has changed the authentic teachings of Islam from authentic sources of knowledge i.e. Qur'an and Sunnah. The scholars who are at the pulpits delivering sermons for this organization and this website know for sure that the British government is promoting this agenda. Yet they have failed to distance themselves from it. This is why it has landed them under the label of "Scholars of Batil". They need to be exposed once again so sincere Muslims who are seeking the path of knowledge and salvation can avoid adopting understanding from these corrupt sources and corrupt scholars. If this agenda can be shown openly to the public, then imagine what has already taken place amongst the Muslim communities. You are aware.... ARE YOU?

Here is an article written by the British Telegraph:

Time and time again, the American media proves it self to be of the same nature: Neo-Conservative. Just today, the I.T.S. gave an interview at Glen Becks radio show. Such unprofessionalism that was displayed by their host. Here is the rundown: